SchoolBondFinder Archives - 91ԭƬ /tag/schoolbondfinder/ K-12 + Higher Education Market Coverage Tue, 11 Aug 2026 18:55:44 +0000 en-US hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.5 /wp-content/uploads/2026/01/cropped-SCN_favicon-32x32.png SchoolBondFinder Archives - 91ԭƬ /tag/schoolbondfinder/ 32 32 Design + Construction Symposium Tackles Real Challenges with Real Solutions /2026/08/11/design-construction-symposium-tackles-real-challenges-with-real-solutions/ Tue, 11 Aug 2026 18:55:44 +0000 /?p=55582 The 91ԭƬ Design + Construction Symposium brought education leaders, architects, designers, contractors, developers and facilities professionals together Aug. 5 at Denver’s historic Tivoli Turnhalle to examine how evolving needs are reshaping the design and delivery of K-12 and higher education environments.Ìý

The post Design + Construction Symposium Tackles Real Challenges with Real Solutions appeared first on 91ԭƬ.

The post Design + Construction Symposium Tackles Real Challenges with Real Solutions appeared first on 91ԭƬ.

]]>
Moderated by Chuck Amos, CEO ofÌýSchoolBondFinder, the panel featured David J. Henderson,ÌýDeputyÌýChief ofÌýOperations for Cherry Creek School District, and Justin Sinnott,ÌýViceÌýPresident ofÌýCorporateÌýOperations at Erickson-Hall.Ìý
Panelists Erika Ashauer, Human Experience Research Lead for HCM’s PK-12 Studio; Joel Williams, Studio Director at QKA; Guy Grace, vice chair of the Partner Alliance for Safer Schools; and Pat Tackney, Security & Architectural Sales Consultant for McGrory Glass Systems, expanded the traditional definition of school safety beyond access control and security hardware.
Panelists Erika Ashauer, Human Experience Research Lead for HCM’s PK-12 Studio; Joel Williams, Studio Director at QKA; Guy Grace, vice chair of the Partner Alliance for Safer Schools; and Pat Tackney, Security & Architectural Sales Consultant for McGrory Glass Systems, expanded the traditional definition of school safety beyond access control and security hardware.

By Lindsey Coulter

The 91ԭƬ Design + Construction Symposium brought education leaders, architects, designers, contractors, developers and facilities professionals together Aug. 5 at Denver’s historic Tivoli Turnhalle to examine how evolving needs are reshaping the design and delivery of K-12 and higher education environments.Ìý

Held on the Auraria Campus, the event focused on project-driven discussions around student belonging, school safety, community engagement, mass timber, urbanÌýdevelopmentÌýand the increasingly compressed construction schedules facing school districts. The symposium was designed to move beyond broad industry trends and examine real projects and lessons that can be applied to future work.Ìý

Designing for BelongingÌý

The program opened with a keynote from Dr. Drew Coleman, Chief of Schools for Jeffco Public Schools, who challenged attendees to consider the relationship between school environments, studentÌýexperienceÌýand educational outcomes.Ìý

Coleman’s presentation, “Building Belonging: Designing Schools Where Students Feel Safe Enough to Learn and Prepared Enough to Lead,â€� examined how the physical environment can either support or hinder student success. His perspective connected education leadership, schoolÌýcultureÌýand the built environment, reinforcing the symposium’s emphasis on designing schools around the needs of the people who use them.Ìý

The keynote was followed by a district-level perspective from Micah Ali, president of Compton Unified School District. Ali discussed the development of Compton High School and the importance of trust,ÌýcontinuityÌýand community partnerships in delivering major educational facilities projects.Ìý

Born and raised in Compton, Ali played a foundational role in the development ofÌýthe highÌýschool and has extensive experience in land use, development and partnerships aimed at expanding opportunities for students.ÌýHe also is helping guide the district’s upcoming Centennial and Dominguez Hills High School projects.ÌýÌý

The discussion illustrated a broader theme that ran throughout the symposium: successful school construction is not simply about delivering a building, but about creating facilities that reflect community priorities and support long-term educational goals.Ìý

Beyond Safety and SecurityÌý

The morning continued with a design panel examining how safety, security,ÌýbelongingÌýand well-being can coexist in school environments.Ìý

PanelistsÌýErika Ashauer, Human Experience Research Lead for HCM’s PK-12 Studio; Joel Williams, Studio Director at QKA; Guy Grace, vice chair of the Partner Alliance for Safer Schools; and Pat Tackney, Security & Architectural Sales Consultant for McGrory Glass Systems,Ìýexpanded the traditional definition of school safety beyond access control and security hardware. Panelists considered how visibility, privacy, supervision,ÌýcomfortÌýand a sense of belonging can influence the experience of students and staff.Ìý

The discussion reflected a broader shift in school design toward environments that address both physical safety and the emotional and social conditions that help students learn.Ìý

Summit House Provides a Case Study in InnovationÌý

Rather than focusing on mass timber as a standalone innovation, the presentation examined the combination of decisions and partnerships required to make the project possible. Those included material selection, planning, logistics, development and construction delivery.
Rather than focusing on mass timber as a standalone innovation, the presentation examined the combination of decisions and partnerships required to make the project possible. Those included material selection, planning, logistics, development and construction delivery.

After a networking break, the symposium shifted from K-12 schools to higher education and studentÌýhousingÌýwith a case studyÌýonÌýMetropolitan State University of Denver’s Summit House.Ìý

Presented byÌýMartha Nelson, Director of Planning, Design and Construction for MSU Denver; Ben Diaz, Senior Development Manager for Columbia Ventures; Macy Huffaker, Project Architect with SAR+ Architects; Ryan Marshall – Superintendent at PCL Construction,ÌýtheÌýsession, moderated by Leone Dick, Chief of Staff to the Vice President of Administration at MSU Denver,Ìýexplored the planning,ÌýdesignÌýand delivery of MSU Denver’s first residence hall.Ìý

Summit HouseÌýrepresentsÌýa significant milestone for the university and for Colorado construction. The 12-story student residence is being delivered using mass timber and is positioned to become the tallest mass-timber structure in the state. The project also incorporates an urban construction environment and a public-private delivery model. (91ԭƬ)Ìý

Rather than focusing on mass timber as a standalone innovation, the presentation examined the combination of decisions and partnershipsÌýrequiredÌýto make the project possible. Those included materialÌýselection, planning,Ìýlogistics,ÌýdevelopmentÌýand construction delivery.Ìý

The case study also gave attendees a closer look at the increasingly complex role of construction teams working in dense urban environments and managing innovative structural systems.Ìý

Racing the Summer Construction ClockÌý

The symposium concluded its formal program with a panel focused on one of the most persistent challenges in K-12 construction: delivering projects within the limited summer construction window.
The symposium concluded its formal program with a panel focused on one of the most persistent challenges in K-12 construction: delivering projects within the limited summer construction window.

The symposium concluded its formal program with a panel focused on one of the most persistent challenges in K-12 construction: delivering projects within the limited summer construction window.Ìý

Moderated by Chuck Amos, CEO ofÌýSchoolBondFinder, the panel featured David J. Henderson,ÌýDeputyÌýChief ofÌýOperations for Cherry Creek School District, and Justin Sinnott,ÌýViceÌýPresident ofÌýCorporateÌýOperations at Erickson-Hall.Ìý

Dubbed “The Summer Sprint,â€� the discussionÌýaddressedÌýplanning, coordination, riskÌýmanagementÌýand project delivery during the period when schools are vacant but must be ready for students when the new academic year begins.Ìý

Henderson brought more than 25 years of K-12 construction andÌýfacilitiesÌýleadership to the discussion, including oversight of approximatelyÌý2 million square feetÌýof capital improvement,ÌýconstructionÌýand renovation projects across Colorado school districts.ÌýSinnott contributed experience in project planning, execution, risk management and operational efficiency.Ìý

The panel underscored how compressed schedules are placing greater emphasis on early planning,ÌýcoordinationÌýand delivery strategies that can reduce risk whileÌýmaintainingÌýquality.Ìý

The topic also reflected broader pressures facing districts nationwide. 91ԭƬ recently examined the “Summer Sprintâ€� as an increasingly demanding period in which districts must complete everything from HVAC replacements and classroom renovations to larger capital projects before students return.Ìý

From Conversation to Job SiteÌý

Attendees also had the opportunity to take the morning’s discussion into the field with an exclusive tour of MSU Denver’s Summit House.
Attendees also had the opportunity to take the morning’s discussion into the field with an exclusive tour of MSU Denver’s Summit House.

Attendees alsoÌýhad the opportunity to take theÌýmorning’sÌýdiscussion into the field with an exclusive tour of MSU Denver’s Summit House.Ìý

The tour provided a firsthand look at the mass-timber residence hall and connected the project’s planning and delivery discussion with its physical construction. According to 91ԭƬ, the projectÌýrepresentsÌýthe intersection of student housing demand, urban development, innovativeÌýmaterialsÌýand alternative approaches to project delivery.Ìý

Across its sessions, the symposium emphasized a common challenge facing both K-12 and higher education: making increasingly complex capital investments serve long-term institutional and community goals.Ìý

From Coleman’s examination of belonging to Ali’s discussion of community trust, the design panel’s exploration of safety and well-being, Summit House’s innovative delivery and the final panel’s focus on compressed construction schedules, the event demonstrated that the future of educational construction will require collaboration across disciplines.Ìý

Rather than treating design, construction, operations and educational outcomes as separate considerations, the symposium brought those perspectives together around a shared question:ÌýHow can the industry create schools and campuses that are not only built successfully, but equipped to serve the people and communities who depend on them?Ìý

The post Design + Construction Symposium Tackles Real Challenges with Real Solutions appeared first on 91ԭƬ.

The post Design + Construction Symposium Tackles Real Challenges with Real Solutions appeared first on 91ԭƬ.

]]>
SchoolBondFinder Shares An In-Depth Look at the Spring 2026 K-12 Bond Market /2026/05/27/schoolbondfinder-shares-an-in-depth-look-at-the-spring-2026-k-12-bond-market/ Wed, 27 May 2026 15:47:47 +0000 /?p=55008 SchoolBondFinder specializes in tracking K-12 capital project bonds across the nation.

The post SchoolBondFinder Shares An In-Depth Look at the Spring 2026 K-12 Bond Market appeared first on 91ԭƬ.

The post SchoolBondFinder Shares An In-Depth Look at the Spring 2026 K-12 Bond Market appeared first on 91ԭƬ.

]]>
SchoolBondFinderÌýisÌýcurrently tracking roughlyÌý$49ÌýbillionÌýof opportunities, with many ofÌýthe organization’sÌýWatchlist items having no money attached yet. | Photo Credit (all): SchoolBondFinder

By PetraÌýSucherÌý

SchoolBondFinderÌýspecializes in tracking K-12 capital project bonds across the nation. The platform monitors school district bond initiatives across key stages, providing stakeholders with crucial data on project scope, financing, and voter outcomes. In March,ÌýSchoolBondFinderÌýshared first-quarter updates and referendum insights for the 2025 andÌý2026 electionÌýcycles.Ìý

The research team is actively updatingÌýthe platform with the latest election results with a “boots on the groundâ€� approach. Most updates for referendum votes are reflected within 24 toÌý72 hoursÌýofÌýpassage.ÌýÌý

Read more forÌýan in-depth look at April and May results, highlighting essential insights for the 2026 K-12 bond market.Ìý

An Overview of April ElectionsÌý

ForÌýAprilÌýa majority of elections occurred on April 7.ÌýApproximatelyÌý80%Ìýof the bonds (120 out of 150) passed,ÌýwhereasÌý30Ìýfailed. The total value for both passed and failed bonds amounts toÌý$4B.ÌýÌýMostÌýdistricts focused on infrastructure and safety. Missouri and Oklahoma were the most active states this month. Missouri hadÌý64ÌýbondsÌýand Oklahoma hadÌý39Ìýbonds.ÌýÌý

Key Districts:Ìý

Wayzata, Minn.Ìý($450,000,000):Ìý

  • Scope:ÌýNew construction of aÌýpublicÌýelementaryÌýschool and a middle school,ÌýasÌýwellÌýasÌýclassroom and lab additions at the high school,ÌýkitchenÌýand cafeteriaÌýexpansions,Ìýand gymnasium additions.Ìý
  • Status:ÌýPassedÌý

Tulsa, Okla.Ìý($276,000,000):Ìý

  • Scope:ÌýExtensive renovationsÌýto an existing public school,Ìýincluding new classrooms, kitchens, ADA compliance upgrades, HVACÌýsystemsÌýand roofing across multiple sites.Ìý
  • Status:ÌýPassedÌý

Howard-Suamico, Wis.Ìý(147,000,000)Ìý

  • Scope:ÌýNew classroom additions and gymnasiums at three elementary schools,Ìýplus Career and Technical EducationÌýlabs andÌýperforming-artsÌýspaces at the high school.Ìý
  • Status:ÌýPassed

Dallas Independent School District Passes $6.2 Billion in Bonds Ìý

On May 2, voters approvedÌý92ÌýofÌý118Ìýpropositions for a passage rate ofÌý78%, which is consistent with national trends. Many Texas school districts had multiple propositions on the ballot. In Texas 10 out of 26 failed, most having to do with athletic propositions.Ìý

DallasÌýIndependent School DistrictÌýpassedÌýitsÌýbond package worthÌý$6.2 billion, theÌýlargest in Texas history.ÌýProposition AÌýwill fund new construction to replace 26 schools andÌýexpandÌýexisting schools, adding classrooms toÌýeliminateÌýportables.ÌýIt will alsoÌýfund efforts to:Ìý

  • RenovateÌýand modernize every campus across the districtÌý
  • Remove the district’s 700 remaining portable classroomsÌý
  • Enhance safety and security at all campusesÌý
  • Upgrade school furniture, student technology, and transportation, including new school busesÌý
  • Improve physical education facilities and repair swimming poolsÌý

The bond packageÌýwill be broken up intoÌýfour propositions to ensure transparency and flexibility. This bond package will leave a generational mark not just for the funding amount, but for the scope of theÌýproject.Ìý

Movement in Michigan,ÌýOhioÌýand MontanaÌý

There wereÌý79Ìýpropositions on the ballot for May 5, most inÌýMichigan, Ohio, and Montana with a mix of bonds and levies. For reference,Ìýa school bond election is a bond issue used by a public school district, typically to finance a building project or other capital project. These measures are placed on the ballot by district school boards to be approved or defeated by the voting public or taxing authority.ÌýAÌýlevy is a short-term, local property tax passed by the voters of a school district that generates revenue for the district to fund programs and services that the state does not fund. Levies are used mostly for operational expenditures.ÌýÌý

In total,Ìý43Ìýpropositions with a value ofÌý$2ÌýbillionÌýpassedÌýon May 5,ÌýwhereasÌý36Ìýpropositions worthÌý$1.6ÌýbillionÌýfailed. The number of bonds passedÌýrepresentsÌýa passage rate of just 54%, lagging historic national trends.ÌýÌý

A recent trendÌýobservedÌýbyÌýSchoolBondFinderÌýresearchers this year involves districts requesting earned income tax levies to fund construction projects,Ìýeither by itself or combined with another funding source like a bond.ÌýResearchersÌýtypically see this for operating levies, but districts in the State of Ohio asking for this to accommodate their construction needs is new.ÌýDistricts mayÌýattemptÌýto attract older voters byÌýutilizingÌýearned income tax levies, as these measures do notÌýimpactÌýthat demographic in the same way increasing property taxes do.ÌýThere were three earned income tax levies on the ballot this month inÌýOhioÌýand all three failed.Ìý

Other May Bond DecisionsÌý

Voters consideredÌý16Ìýtotal propositions during this election cycle, resulting inÌýsixÌýpassing andÌý10Ìýfailing.ÌýBonds were approved in Mississippi, Massachusetts, Nebraska (2 districts),ÌýMinnesotaÌýand West Virginia. With most of the propositions focused on new construction.Ìý

  • Passed Amount: Totaling $498,285,000Ìý
  • Failed Amount: Totaling $342,648,950Ìý

ThereÌýwereÌýa total ofÌý127Ìýpropositions that went to voteÌýon May 19. Of those,Ìý113Ìýpassed forÌýa passage rate ofÌý88%. The majority of those on the ballot occurred in New York.ÌýA total ofÌý94ÌýbondsÌýpassed, totaling overÌý$1ÌýbillionÌýin New York.Ìý

Factors Influencing District Priority ShiftsÌý

In addition to the well-known challenges of declining enrollment and district operational difficulties, several other factors are at playÌýschool consolidations,ÌýexpirationÌýof Cares Act funding, voter resistance to specific measuresÌýand aÌýdownward trend in birth rates.ÌýThese changes suggest districts may be pivoting priorities to better serve local needs and moving away from projects fueled by federal programs.ÌýÌý

Key Focus Areas for Passed BondsÌý

Despite these challenges, passed bonds are still showingÌýstrong supportÌýfor key focus areas, such as specialty areas,ÌýHVAC systems, athletic facilities, instructional spaces, and electricalÌýandÌýlighting upgrades.

SchoolBondFinderÌýisÌýcurrently tracking roughlyÌý$49ÌýbillionÌýof opportunities, with many ofÌýthe organization’sÌýWatchlist items having no money attached yet.ÌýResearchersÌýare trackingÌýmore thanÌý1,726Ìýbonds as of May 22.ÌýElectionsÌýin June and August are around the corner and will be featured alongsideÌýtheÌý2026 Q2 updates and researcher insightsÌýthis summer.

Petra Sucher is the Marketing Engagement & Analytics Manager for .

The post SchoolBondFinder Shares An In-Depth Look at the Spring 2026 K-12 Bond Market appeared first on 91ԭƬ.

The post SchoolBondFinder Shares An In-Depth Look at the Spring 2026 K-12 Bond Market appeared first on 91ԭƬ.

]]>
New Partnership with SchoolBondFinder Brings Bond, Referendum Insights to 91ԭƬ /2026/03/30/new-partnership-with-schoolbondfinder-brings-bond-referendum-insights-to-school-construction-news/ Mon, 30 Mar 2026 15:25:16 +0000 /?p=54841 Recognizing the critical value of connecting readers with bond- and referendum-related insights, 91ԭƬ is proud to announce a new partnership withÌýSchoolBondFinderÌýthat will bringÌýSchoolBondFinder’sÌýexpertiseÌýand capital project bond insights to 91ԭƬ readers.Ìý

The post New Partnership with SchoolBondFinder Brings Bond, Referendum Insights to 91ԭƬ appeared first on 91ԭƬ.

The post New Partnership with SchoolBondFinder Brings Bond, Referendum Insights to 91ԭƬ appeared first on 91ԭƬ.

]]>
By Petra SucherÌý

SBF Short LogoAs school districts nationwide grapple with aging infrastructure, evolving educational models and heightened community expectations, K-12 bond measures have become a critical mechanism for funding transformation. Beyond simple capital campaigns, these referendums reflect shifting priorities around safety,ÌýflexibilityÌýand long-term facility performance.ÌýÌý

Recognizing the critical value of connecting readers with bond- and referendum-related insights, 91ԭƬ is proud to announce a new partnership withÌýÌýthat will bringÌýSchoolBondFinder’sÌýexpertiseÌýand capital project bond insights to 91ԭƬ readers.ÌýSchoolBondFinderÌýprovides a data-driven lens into how districts are planning,ÌýproposingÌýand delivering projects—offeringÌýstakeholdersÌýa clearer view of where investment is occurring and how those decisions are shaping the future of learning environments.Ìý

The School Bond Finder K-12 Bond PlatformÌýÌý

SchoolBondFinderÌýspecializes in tracking K-12 capital project bonds across the nation. Our platform monitors school district bond initiatives across key stages, providing stakeholders with crucial data on project scope, financing, and voter outcomes.Ìý

  • Watch List:ÌýDistricts may be added to this list following initial activities such as a facilities study, demographic study, capital improvement plans review, or a feasibility survey.Ìý
  • Proposed List: A bond is moved to this list once a school board officially approves a referendum for a vote.ÌýAt this point, the vote date, official ballot language, use, and amount areÌýfinalized.Ìý
  • Passed/Failed List:ÌýUpdates on school bond referendum votes—bothÌýpassedÌýandÌýfailed—are typically available on our platform within 24 toÌý72 hoursÌýof the official results being released.Ìý

A Recap of 2025 BondsÌý

As the first quarter of 2026 wrapsÌýupÌýit is important to look back at 2025 for reference. In 2025ÌýSchoolBondFinderÌýtrackedÌý$91ÌýBillion worth of bonds. ApproximatelyÌý$69.2ÌýbillionÌýpassed,ÌýwhereasÌý$22.7ÌýbillionÌýfailed. The overall passage rate for 2025 wasÌý75%, which aligns with the trendÌýobservedÌýover the last few years. Our research team tracks school bond activity nationwide, with the highest total bond amounts recorded in Texas ($18.4 billion), California ($6.1 billion), Ohio ($3.5 billion), Washington ($3.4 billion), and Pennsylvania ($3.0 billion) in 2025.Ìý

Historic TrendsÌý

The chart below illustrates spending amounts for both passed and failed referendums over the past eight years. Election years typically show an increase in both the number and total value of bonds proposed, a trend often attributed to higher voter turnout during presidential elections, which can improve referendum passage rates.
The chart illustrates spending amounts for both passed and failed referendums over the past eight years. Election years typically show an increase in both the number and total value of bonds proposed, a trend often attributed to higher voter turnout during presidential elections, which can improve referendum passage rates.

The chart below illustrates spending amounts for both passed and failed referendums over the past eight years. Election years typically show an increase in both the number and total value of bonds proposed, aÌýtrend often attributed to higher voter turnout during presidential elections, which can improve referendum passage rates.Ìý

An eight-year longitudinal analysis (2018–2025) highlights consistent trends in K-12 bond funding, offering insight into evolving educational priorities. During this period, bond measures mostÌýfrequentlyÌýsupported the following project areas:Ìý

  • SpecialityÌýAreasÌýÌý
  • Instructional AreasÌý
  • Athletic FacilitiesÌý
  • HVACÌýSystemsElectricalÌýand Lighting UpgradesÌý
  • Electrical / Lighting UpgradesÌý

Given that most instructional buildings were built before the 1970s, it is no surprise that infrastructure upgrades are a top priority for school districts. Capital improvements continue to be focused on modernizing student learning environments. These spaces include classrooms, libraries, laboratories, and specialized facilities. The goal is student-centered learning, achieved through flexible environments that incorporate mobile furniture, integrated technology, and versatile layouts.Ìý

2026 Year to Date – First QuarterÌý

As of March 2026, approximatelyÌý$6ÌýbillionÌýin K–12 bonds have been approved.ÌýRoughlyÌý267Ìýbond measures were tracked in the first quarter, resulting in aÌý70%Ìýpassage rate. Approved bonds were concentrated primarily in specialty areas (ieÌýcafeterias, sensory rooms, admin spaces), HVAC systems, and instructional spaces. The top three states (WA, KS, and IL) account for aboutÌý66%Ìýof the total bond amount passed in Q1.ÌýÌý

2026 Bond PrioritiesÌý

TheÌýSchoolBondFinderÌýdatabase is currently tracking a total ofÌý1,478Ìýbonds scheduled for 2026 and beyond, as of March. ApproximatelyÌý117Ìýbonds are scheduled to go to vote throughoutÌýthe month of April, with more elections scheduled in May and June. The combined Proposed and Watch List bondsÌýrepresentÌýapproximatelyÌý$56 billionÌýin potential opportunity.ÌýÌý

K-12 School bonds are currently prioritizing construction, capital improvements, technology upgrades, and security enhancements. Many districts areÌýseekingÌýsmaller, more targeted amounts for referendums, which may be more appealing to taxpayers and could be a more achievable strategy compared to large, multimillion-dollar bonds.Ìý

  • Facility Longevity and Maintenance: There is a growing focus on facility longevity and maintenance over expansion. Renovation and repair projects are the most frequent, while new construction and major system/envelope upgradesÌýrepresentÌýhigher-value contracts.Ìý
  • Student-Centric Modernization:ÌýA significant portionÌýof bond funding targets modernization and expansion of areas directlyÌýimpactingÌýstudent learning and extracurricular activities. This includes projects focused on flexible learning spaces, modern classrooms, and auditorium renovations, showing a high demand for multi-purpose furniture solutions.Ìý
  • Infrastructure and Safety: Basic infrastructureÌýremainsÌýa consistent priority. Projects related to safety/security and system/building envelope upgrades, such as HVAC replacement, roof repairs, andÌýsecurityÌýshow a commitment to the health, safety, and long-term goals of school facilities.Ìý

More Info and Insights to ComeÌý

Looking ahead, the trajectory of K-12 bond fundingÌýsuggests a more strategic, targeted approach to capital investment—one that balances fiscal realities with the urgent need to modernize facilities. As districts continue to prioritize infrastructure resilience, student-centered design and operational efficiency, access toÌýtimely, reliable data will remain essential. Platforms likeÌýSchoolBondFinderÌýare critical resources for A/E/C stakeholders,ÌýprovidingÌýthe in-depth insights necessary for better decision-making and efficientÌýutilizationÌýof K-12 funding opportunities.Ìý

Watch for quarterly insights fromÌýSchoolBondFinderÌýto learn more about upcoming opportunities.Ìý

Petra Sucher is the Marketing Engagement & Analytics Manager withÌý.Ìý

The post New Partnership with SchoolBondFinder Brings Bond, Referendum Insights to 91ԭƬ appeared first on 91ԭƬ.

The post New Partnership with SchoolBondFinder Brings Bond, Referendum Insights to 91ԭƬ appeared first on 91ԭƬ.

]]>